DR. SARAFI lawyers obtain further preliminary injunction against comedian Enissa Amani
From our press archive. This communication gives the status of the original publication of 19 November 2025 again. Subsequent developments in the process are not automatically taken into account.
Frankfurt/Main, November 19, 2025 — The Press Chamber of the Hamburg Regional Court fully approved our request in connection with statements made by comedian Enissa Amani during an appearance in October 2025 and issued a preliminary injunction against Ms. Amani. The court made it unequivocally clear that the naming and public presentation of our client on the Instagram platform without consent was unlawful.
The cause of the incident was a rescheduling by Ms. Amani at short notice — namely just five days before the event — and demanded for the second time for her comedy event “ENISSANCE TOUR”.
The date originally planned for February 2025 had already been postponed at the special request of Mrs. Amani. The operator of the event space was now only prepared to agree to a further postponement upon payment of the contractually agreed cancellation fee, as all security, technical and service-related advance payments were bindingly booked for October 2025 and could no longer be cancelled at short notice.
However, instead of seeking a factual or amicable solution, Ms. Amani decided to publicly attack our client. On October 3, 2025, she published his full name to around 1.3 million Instagram followers and blamed him for what she considered to be an unwillingness to reschedule the appointment without covering costs. She also added several insulting and derogatory remarks to the post, including:
She also added the following insults to the article, probably directed at third parties:
- An “Hs” (son of a whore) on YouTube
- “When I see your ugly face live”
- “YOU PE*HEILER DOG” (pedophile)
- “We are politically neutral and want 7000 EUR”
- “Zios” (Zionists)
- Full name of our client
Our client was clearly only responsible for processing the contract as the responsible employee and was legally obliged to insist on payment of the cancellation fee. Public identification offered no added value to public information formation.
The Hamburg Regional Court confirmed this legal opinion unequivocally. There was no discernible legitimate interest in naming the name; rather, it would involve a pillory effect that violates our client's general personal rights.
In our opinion, it was obvious that Ms. Amani was aiming to expose our client to the aggressive momentum of her followers. It wasn't the first time this happened.
The decision strengthens the protection of uninvolved third parties from digital pillory and once again shows clear limits to personally discrediting forms of communication on social media.
For inquiries:
DR. SARAFI Rechtsanwälte
info@sarafi.de