A prompt becomes a publication. There are rights in between.
AI images, synthetic voices and digital performers open up new opportunities for productions. We clarify the legal issues, from the source material used to the tool conditions to publication and contractual transfer.
Your point of contact: AI content, voices & digital likenesses
Dr. Nik Sarafi
Attorney-at-law · Founder & Managing Director
Dr. Nik Sarafi represents creators, streamers and other parties involved in press and speech law disputes. Other focal areas include media and gaming law as well as digital business models. He is responsible for the direction of the law firm.
AI content, voices & digital likenesses in practice.
We look at inputs, processing and results separately. Permission from the tool provider does not automatically answer whether rights to a person depicted, a recording or an external work are affected. The starting point is therefore your specific workflow and intended use. It is about a legal review, not a blanket approval of all AI content.
01
Image, design & campaigns
Reference images, product presentations and edited photos are checked in the planned publishing context. We differentiate between rights to the source material, to identifiable persons and to the results produced.
02
Music, voice cloning & audio
Composition, recording and voice may affect different legal positions. We review approvals and contracts for synthetic voices, AI editing and the use of the finished audio material.
We support agreements on digital images and AI processing. Purpose, control, remuneration and subsequent reuse should be clarified before production and transfer.
When using our own data sets or using third-party content for AI, we look at access, licenses and legal barriers. For works accessible online, a machine-readable reservation of use may be relevant. This does not replace a review of the specific training process.
We classify the applicable transparency requirements according to role, content and use and help with internal approvals. The free AI check provides a first introduction to selected transparency issues.
First, briefly describe the facts. We will coordinate with you how to submit further documents.
Sample material and description of the desired use
Tool names, contract terms, and settings
Sources, licenses and consents to source material
People involved and planned distribution channels
Working with us
From the request to the mandate.
Before the assignment, we agree on the scope of services and remuneration. When taking over, we will name your legal contact person.
01
inquiry
They describe the facts, the parties involved and known deadlines.
02
Acceptance of your matter
We agree on performance and compensation and name your contact person.
03
machining
The responsible lawyer will check your documents and coordinate the procedure with you.
AI content, voices & digital likenesses
Questions & answers.
Does every image generated with AI belong to me?
A commercial use permit under tool conditions is not the same as a private copyright. Copyright protection requires personal intellectual creation. What human contributions exist and which rights of third parties are affected must be considered in concrete terms.
Can I synthetically reproduce a familiar voice?
The technical option is not a legal permit. In particular, we check personal rights, the use of existing recordings, contractual approvals and the specific context. A delusion about someone's involvement can trigger additional questions.
Can training replace individual approval?
Training can make risks and decision-making processes understandable. Whether a particular production can be published may still require a separate review. For this, the scope and costs can be agreed in advance.
English translation of our German website. Statutory references concern German or EU law. The German original remains available through the language selector.